Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

59
LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY - LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY
londonmet.ac.uk
59
HAW STARTSEITE: HAW HAMBURG
haw-hamburg.de
59
DONAU-UNIVERSITÄT KREMS - DIE UNIVERSITÄT FÜR WEITERBILDUNG. - DONAU-UNIVERSITÄT KREMS
donau-uni.ac.at
59
DISCOVER THE CAREER UNIVERSITY | UNIVERSITY OF WEST LONDON
uwl.ac.uk
59
PORTAL UCA – PORTAL PRINCIPAL DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE CÁDIZ
uca.es
58
UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS LONDON
arts.ac.uk
58
UNIVERSITÀ DI MACERATA: L'UMANESIMO CHE INNOVA
unimc.it

59 haw-hamburg.de Last Updated: 4 months

Success 62% of passed verification steps
Warning 23% of total warning
Errors 15% of total errors, require fast action

Desktop

Mobile

Performance Desktop Score 87%
Best Practices Desktop Score 85%
SEO Desktop Score 90%
Progressive Web App Desktop Score 46%
Performance Mobile Score 42%
Best Practices Mobile Score 85%
SEO Mobile Score 75%
Progressive Web App Mobile Score 44%
Page Authority Authority 47%
Domain Authority Domain Authority 56%
Moz Rank 4.7/10
Bounce Rate Rate 0%
charset Encoding
Great, language/character encoding is specified: UTF-8
Title Tag 27 Characters
HAW STARTSEITE: HAW HAMBURG
Meta Description 94 Characters
Design, Medien und Information, Life Sciences, Technik und Informatik, Wirtschaft und Soziales
Effective URL 42 Characters
https://www.haw-hamburg.de/startseite.html
Excerpt Page content
HAW Startseite: HAW Hamburg SelfserviceImpressumDatenschutzA-ZSitemapsKontaktStartseite Quicklinks ...AStABibliotheken (HIBS)Co...
Keywords Cloud Density
studiengänge4 departments3 studierende3 mehr3 fakultäten3 selfservice2 hamburg2 studienplätze2 informationen2 freie2
Keyword Consistency Keyword density is one of the main terms in SEO
Keyword Freq Title Desc Domain H1 H2
studiengänge 4
departments 3
studierende 3
mehr 3
fakultäten 3
selfservice 2
hamburg 2
studienplätze 2
informationen 2
freie 2
Google Preview Your look like this in google search result
HAW STARTSEITE: HAW HAMBURG
https://www.haw-hamburg.de/startseite.html
Design, Medien und Information, Life Sciences, Technik und Informatik, Wirtschaft und Soziales
Robots.txt File No Found
Sitemap.xml File No Found
Page Size Code & Text Ratio
Document Size: ~26.54 KB
Code Size: ~22.85 KB
Text Size: ~3.69 KB Ratio: 13.90%

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

1,109
Unique Visits
Daily
2,051
Pages Views
Daily
$4
Income
Daily
31,052
Unique Visits
Monthly
58,454
Pages Views
Monthly
$100
Income
Monthly
359,316
Unique Visits
Yearly
689,136
Pages Views
Yearly
$1,056
Income
Yearly

Desktop

Desktop Screenshot
Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 176 KB
Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity
Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 176 KB
Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption
Reduce server response times (TTFB) Root document took 790 ms
Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response
Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 1,220 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles
Enable text compression Potential savings of 377 KB
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes
Efficiently encode images Potential savings of 71 KB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data
Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 0 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
JavaScript execution time 0.1 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
Server Backend Latencies 0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance
Speed Index 1.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated
First CPU Idle 1.2 s
First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).
Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 995 KB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times
Minimizes main-thread work 0.3 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
First Contentful Paint 1.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 2 vulnerabilities detected
Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers
Avoid chaining critical requests 22 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load
Avoids an excessive DOM size 359 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)
Minify JavaScript Potential savings of 30 KB
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time
First Meaningful Paint 1.2 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible
Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 56 requests • 995 KB
To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 23 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task
Time to Interactive 1.2 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive
Network Round Trip Times 0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance
Estimated Input Latency 10 ms
Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy
Minify CSS Potential savings of 55 KB
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes

Mobile

Mobile Screenshot
Reduce server response times (TTFB) Root document took 1,190 ms
Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response
Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 4,140 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles
Enable text compression Potential savings of 377 KB
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes
Efficiently encode images Potential savings of 71 KB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data
Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 120 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading
Total Blocking Time 180 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
JavaScript execution time 0.6 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
Server Backend Latencies 0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance
Defer offscreen images Potential savings of 22 KB
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive
Speed Index 6.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated
First CPU Idle 5.7 s
First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).
Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 998 KB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times
Minimizes main-thread work 1.3 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
First Contentful Paint 4.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 2 vulnerabilities detected
Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers
Avoid chaining critical requests 22 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load
Avoids an excessive DOM size 360 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)
Minify JavaScript Potential savings of 30 KB
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time
First Meaningful Paint 4.3 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible
Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 57 requests • 998 KB
To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 23 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page
Max Potential First Input Delay 150 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task
Time to Interactive 9.2 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive
Network Round Trip Times 0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance
First Contentful Paint (3G) 8983 ms
First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network
Estimated Input Latency 10 ms
Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy
Minify CSS Potential savings of 55 KB
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes
Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 176 KB
Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity
Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 176 KB
Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption

Speed And Optimization Tips

Website speed has a huge impact on performance, affecting user experience, conversion rates and even rankings. ‪‬‬By reducing page load-times, users are less likely to get distracted and the search engines are more likely to reward you by ranking you
Title Website
Congratulations! Your title is optimized
Description Website
Congratulations! Your description is optimized
Robots.txt
Warning! Your site not have a robots.txt file
Sitemap.xml
Warning! Not found a sitemap file for your website
SSL Secure
Congratulations! Your site have Support to HTTPS
Headings
Congratulations! You are using your H1 and H2 tags in your site
Blacklist
Congratulations! Your site is not listed in a blacklist
W3C Validator
Congratulations! Your site not have errors W3C
Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP)
Warning! Your site not have AMP Version
Domain Authority
Congratulations! Your Domain Authority is good
GZIP Compress
Warning! Your site not is compressed, this can make slower response for the visitors
Favicon
Warning! Your site not have a favicon
Broken Links
Congratulations! You not have broken links View links

Alexa Rank

4,384

Local Rank: DE / Users: 80.3% / PageViews: 85.7%

125,879

Global Rank

Information Server

Response Header HTTP headers carry information about the client browser, the requested page and the server
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 22:40:53 GMT
Server: Apache
Content-Encoding: gzip
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Expires: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 22:40:53 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
DNS Records DNS Resource Records associated with a hostname
View DNS Records